Search the USF Web site Site Map USF home page
Links for Prospective Students Links for Our Students Links for Visitors Links for Faculty & Staff Links for Alumni & Parents USF Campuses Links for Business & Community

 

Master’s Program in Applied Behavior Analysis

 

Office of Graduate Studies

 

University of South Florida

 

 

 

Practicum Competencies

 

February, 2001

Master’s Program in Applied Behavior Analysis

Office of Graduate Studies

University of South Florida

 

Practicum Competencies

 

The USF Applied Behavior Analysis Program requires the completion of practicum activities under the direct supervision of a Certified Behavior Analyst (CBA) who has been approved as a field practicum supervisor.  This supervisor is required to sign off on an official program competency form verifying completion of each activity.  The student should acquire a 3-ring binder in which are placed: (1) the present documents, and (2) a file system for the physical documentation of each activity.  This constitutes evidence that the practicum activities have been completed.  All pertinent records, such as data sheets and graphs, should be saved for the growing portfolio of evidence.  The official competency form should be placed as a cover sheet at the beginning of each section to briefly summarize how the objective was achieved.  This should occur prior to obtaining the signature of the supervising CBA.  All of this activity is under the governance of the USF ABA Program Coordinator and the student’s Major Professor. 

 

It should be understood that the following directions for competencies are suggestions that narrow the focus of practicum activities.  However, there is latitude in exactly how the response to each competency is fashioned—as long as the on-site Practicum Supervisor agrees.  Considerable flexibility is necessary as each student will have different opportunities and situations.  Students may join with other students on many activities, especially when reliability checks are necessary.  In these cases, both (or several) students may achieve a competency together.  The critically important result is that ALL students acquire the technical skills described by the competency.

 

Definition of terminology varies somewhat in the field of applied behavior analysis.  The Program Coordinator or a student’s Major Professor can provide guidance in accomplishing each activity.  When uncertain about the definition of terminology, a student should go to the following summary/comparison of terminology on the WEB:

 

www.coedu.usf.edu/abaglossary

 

            When there are specific questions about procedures, one text used in the ABA Program is Applied Behavior Analysis by Cooper, Heron & Heward (1987).   Consult the ABA Program Coordinator or the Major Professor for interpretation, if necessary.

 

            All students should accomplish these objectives at a steady rate throughout the two-year program--not leave them until they registration for practicum hours has occurred.  Some courses may require the accomplishment of projects.  When these projects fit the competency requirements, they can be counted using the course instructor’s signature.

 

The Faculty Steering Committee (FSC) has assigned an estimated number of points for each practicum competency.  Each point is comparable to a minimum of one hour of effort.  Therefore, 120 points is estimated to be equivalent to approximately 120 hours of effort.  It may take more or less time for any given activity, but the accumulation of the Steering Committee’s point assignment will be used to calculate total accumulated effort.  Add the total number of points assigned to the competencies which have signatures to determine progress. 

 

Competencies marked with an asterisk (*) are required for successful completion of the program’s practicum experiences.  In addition to completing the required competencies, a total number of practicum points must be achieved using a selection from the remaining (non-asterisk) competencies.  A student may choose among the optional competencies to complete the total points required by the program.  There are 51 required competencies that total 125 points and 20 optional competencies that total 61 points. Therefore, if a student completes all competencies, the student will have completed 71 competencies and 186 points.

 

After completing a competency, the student should complete the Practicum Competency Form (Appendix 2) and obtain the signature of the CBA or BCBA who supervised the completion of the competency.  Additionally, the competency and the initials of the supervisor should be listed on the Practicum Competency Log (see Appendix 3). It is suggested that a personal cumulative graph be used by each student to show the number of practicum competency points for which signatures have been obtained.  This graph should have the total number of points required at the right side with a cumulative line of progress beginning at the left side.  This graph should be kept in a prominent place to remind the student of this program requirement.  The Practicum Supervisor may occasionally ask students to submit a copy of this program graph to stay aware of student progress.  Therefore, when a student’s practicum has been completed, the student will have the following documentation:  a Practicum Competency Form for each competency completed; one Practicum Competency Log; and a cumulative graph to show completion of the competencies. 

 

Students should always secure permission prior to the implementation of any procedure with children and adults.  Compliance with ethical standards for the practice of behavior analysis is necessary when working with individuals in accomplishing the competencies (e.g., permission from the agency, written consent secured form individual or legal guardian for overcorrection and punishment procedures, careful assessment of any potential risk to the individual prior to the application of a procedure).

 

The competencies are divided into the following sections:  Behavioral Assessment; Functional Relationships; Establishing, Strengthening, and Weakening Behavior; Generalization and Maintenance of Intervention Effects; Transfer of Technology; and Complex Techniques.

 

 


Table of Contents

 

I.          Behavioral Assessment

 

A.      Descriptive Analysis OR Functional Assessment

*Competency 1 - Conduct a functional assessment (also referred to as Descriptive Analysis) 4 pts 

*Competency 2 - Use direct and indirect measures of behavior and the environment

(2 pts)

*Competency 3 - Calculate reliability of direct and indirect observation (3 pts)    

*Competency 4 – Identification and measurement of relevant setting events

 (2 pts)    

 

Accuracy of Measurement

*Competency 5 - Construct behavioral definitions of behavior described in vernacular terms (2 pts.)    

*Competency 6 - Evaluate observer reactivity (3 pts)    

Competency 7 - Evaluate treatment drift (5 pts)    

Competency 8 - Identify sequence effects (4 pts)    

 

Calibration of Measurement Procedures

Competency 9 - Calibrate a measurement procedure (3 pts)     

*Competency 10 - Evaluate accuracy, agreement, calibration, and evaluation of observer drift. (3 pts.)    

 

Data Recording Methods

*Competency 11- Identify and measure permanent products (2 pts)    

*Competency 12 - Employ whole interval and partial interval recording

techniques (3 pts.)    

*Competency 13- Employ various time sampling techniques (3 pts)    

*Competency 14 - Measure latency (1 pt)     

*Competency 15 - Create codes and use them to observe (2 pts)             

Competency 16 - Employ measurement in free-operant and fixed-trial procedures for conditioning, measurement, and evaluation (4 pts)    

*Competency 17 - Conduct continuous and sample observations (4 pts)    

*Competency 18 - Measure interresponse times (2 pts)    

Reliability

*Competency 19 - Calculate reliability interval-by-interval and by scored-interval/unscored-intervals (3 pts)    

 

II.  Functional Analysis (Research Designs)

*Competency 20 - Employ the reversal design (4 pts)    

*Competency 21 - Employ multiple baseline across participants and situations (5 pts)   

*Competency 22- Determine appropriate steps and apply them in a changing criterion design (3 pts)    

*Competency 23 - Apply the alternating treatments design (3 pts)    

Competency 24 - Employ a multiple-probe design (3 pts)    

Competency 25 - Given a case in point, identify and employ the most appropriate experimental design (5 pts)    

Competency 26 - Do a systematic and a direct replication of a specific

procedure (1 pt)    

*Competency 27 - Given data to plot, construct graphs using ABA

conventions (1 pt)    

*Competency 28 - Apply measures of discovering trends in data (3 pts)  

 

*Competency 29 - Correctly identify points in data path that are appropriate for

condition changes (1 pt)    

*Competency 30 - Plot an imperfect correlation of data using a scatter plot (1 pt)   

*Competency 31 - Employ semi logarithmic charts (2 pts)    

Competency 32 - Construct a split-middle line of progress (1 pt)    

Competency 33 - Calculate a quarter-intersect line of progress (1 pt)    

 

III. Establishing, Strengthening, and Weakening Behavior

 

A. Ethical Considerations

*Competency 34 - Demonstrate person-centered planning in intervention

development (2 pts)    

*Competency 35 - Conduct a functional assessment prior to developing

intervention (4 pts for Competency 1)   

*Competency 36 - Obtain consent from the client or client-surrogate prior to implementing intervention (2 pts)   

*Competency 37 - Use the least restrictive procedure(s) necessary to be effective in intervention   (2 pts)  

 

B.      Behavior Change Procedures:  Antecedent Procedures

Stimulus control

*Competency 38 – Incidental teaching (2 pts)

*Competency 39:  Establish stimulus control (generalization and discrimination)  (1 pt)  *Competency 40:  Show response generalization. (2 pts)

            Competency 41:  Demonstrate the generalization gradient.   (3 pts)

Competency 42:  Show concept formation (i.e., generalization within and across stimulus classes).  (3 pts)

 

Motivational variables

*Competency 43:  Use an establishing operation. (2 pts)

 

Multiple causation

Competency 44:  Establish/demonstrate multiple variable control. (4 pts)  

 

       C. Behavior Change Procedures:  Consequence Procedures

Reinforcement

*Competency 45 - Demonstrate positive and negative reinforcement    (2 pts)

*Competency 46 – Demonstrate the extinction procedure and note effects.  (2 pts)

 

Reinforcement Schedules

*Competency 47 - Demonstrate appropriate thinning of reinforcement

Schedules (2 pts)    

*Competency 48- Demonstrate use of limited hold reinforcement

contingency (1 pt)    

*Competency 49 - Determine appropriate intermittent reinforcement schedules for maintenance (1 pt)    

Competency 50 - Apply DRO, DRI, DRA, and DRL schedules and graph the

 results (2 pts)    

*Competency 51 - Apply relevant schedules of reinforcement (2 pts)    

 

 

Shaping

*Competency 52 – Correctly use differential reinforcement while shaping behavior

(1 pt)

           

 

Punishment

*Competency 53- Apply punishment procedure using the least restrictive procedure necessary, and record primary and secondary effects (2 pts)    

Competency 54 - Employ time out procedures appropriately and measure the

 effects (3 pts)   

Competency 55- Apply response cost procedures; note effects  (2 pts)  

Competency 56 - Employ overcorrection  (4 pts)   

 

Respondent Conditioning

Competency 57 - Establish a conditioned stimulus in the respondent paradigm and/or show the extinction of an unconditioned or conditioned response (3 pts)    

 

IV. Generalization and Maintenance of Intervention Effects

 

*Competency 58- Demonstrate the use of natural contingencies in intervention

planning (2 pts) 

*Competency 59 - Demonstrate the use of reinforcement and procedure fading after the establishment of behavior to facilitate maintenance of intervention effects (2 pts)     

*Competency 60 - Demonstrate use of diverse training procedures in intervention planning and implementation  (2 pts)  

*Competency 61 - Demonstrate the incorporation of functional mediators in intervention planning and implementation  (2 pts)  

 

V. Transfer of Technology

 

*Competency 62 - Demonstrate use of competency-based training to disseminate intervention planning and implementation procedures to multiple providers /

caregivers (4 pts)    

 

VI. Complex Techniques

 

*Competency 63 - Use reinforcer sampling techniques (4 pts)    

*Competency 64 - Construct contingency contracts, implement them, and note

 effects (5 pts)   

*Competency 65 - Apply group-oriented behavior management

techniques (5 pts)    

*Competency 66 - Conduct informal and structured interviews and describe the advantages and disadvantages (3 pts)      

*Competency 67- Employ self-management procedure (5 pts)      

Competency 68 - Construct a token economy, implement, and evaluate it (5 pts)    

Competency 69 - Chain behavior using backward and forward chaining

methods   (2 pts)  

*Competency 70 - Develop imitative behavior (3 pts)    

Competency 71 - Apply the good behavior game  (3 pts) 

 

 

 


I.                   Behavioral Assessment

 

A.     Descriptive Analysis OR Functional Assessment

 

*Competency 1.  Conduct a functional assessment (also referred to as Descriptive Analysis)

 

Descriptive Analysis (as used in the Florida Task List and Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Statements for Applied Behavior Analysis, Second Edition, March, 1997)

Definition:  a behavioral assessment method that provides an organized, conceptually sound and efficacious method for obtaining descriptive and quantitative data, which are essential to the decision to intervene, where to intervene, how to intervene and the identification of functional relationships. It is used to obtain and organize relevant information about behavior and its circumstances; to develop hypotheses regarding the need for or alternatives to behavior analysis services, the locus of intervention and functional relationships based on the information obtained; and to provide useful information for evaluating interventions on an on-going basis.  

AND

Functional Assessment (as used in Miltenberger, 2001)

Definition:  The process of generating information on the events preceding and following the behavior in an attempt to determine which antecedents and consequences are reliably associated with the occurrence of the behavior.  Includes indirect assessment through interviews and questionnaires, direct observation of the antecedents and consequences in the natural environment, and functional analysis methods involving the manipulation of environmental events. 

 

NOTE:  The terms “descriptive analysis” and “functional assessment” are used interchangeably in the field of behavior analysis. 

 

Directions:  Select an individual with a problem behavior.  Collect data via both indirect and direct methods to determine the controlling variables for the behavior and the desired appropriate replacement behavior.  Form a hypothesis concerning the controlling variables.  Provide evidence using direct measures that the hypothesis generated was related functionally to the problem behavior. 

 

FSC estimated investment of practicum effort:  4 pts

 

Apply Direct and indirect measurement

 

 *Competency 2:  Use direct and indirect measures of behavior and the environment. 

 

Definition:  Direct measurement practices are those in which the events measured are the same as those about which conclusions will be drawn, for example, number of head-bangs, incidents of stuttering, or frequency of appropriate play behaviors.  Indirect measurement practices are those in which the events measured are not the same as those about which conclusions will be drawn.  Outcome measures, for example, lawns mowed, rooms cleaned, problems worked correctly, etc., are examples of indirect measurement.  Direct measurement has the advantage of providing information about who exhibited the behaviors, but indirect measures may be much less expensive or all that are feasible.  Ratings or questionnaires are forms of indirect measures but they are often suspect because their correspondence with data that are derived by direct measures may be poor. 

 

Directions:  Your direct measurement competencies may have been completed by an objective elsewhere in this list.  If not, an excellent performance of this task would be to measure the same behavior by direct and by indirect methods.  Then compare the correspondence.  For example, you could ask a person to take his shopping list and tell you on a separate list the brands he is like to buy of each item.  Do this a day or two ahead of shopping and do not show him what he told you about the brands he will select.  Then inspect the groceries when he comes home and determine the correspondence between the indirect measure of what he buys and the outcome measure.  You could, of course, surreptitiously observe what he takes off the shelf in the store-this would be direct measurement.  There are many other ways of accomplishing this objective.

 

FSC estimated investment of practicum effort:   __2___ points

 

*Competency 3:  Calculate reliability of direct and indirect observation.

 

Definition:  A direct observation is one that is personally seen (or heard) by the observer and immediately recorded.  Direct measurement involves practices in which the behavior measured is directly observed by the person evaluating it (i.e., head-bangs, correct speech articulations, etc).  Indirect measurement practices are those in which the events measured are not the same as those about which conclusions will be drawn.  Indirect measures may be number of problems completed, dishes washed, rooms cleaned, etc.  Outcome measures are indirect.  "Reliability" refers to the consistency of measurement.  In applied behavior analysis, preferably, different observers estimate reliability by assessing the interobserver agreement, or coefficient of agreement between two or more independently scored records of data in the same episodes.  The coefficient of agreement often is calculated as a percentage by dividing the number of agreements by the number of agreements plus disagreements, then multiplying the fraction by one hundred. Agreement measures should be reported for each phase of a within subject design when feasible. When estimating reliability of interval recording systems, if there are many unscored intervals, only scored intervals should be included in the calculations, or two separate percentages of agreement can calculated-one for scored, one for unscored intervals.

 

Directions:  Select a behavior that can be observed directly at least several times during each session.  Observe the behavior for at least three sessions (using two or more observers).  Break the sessions into intervals.  Summarize the inter-observer agreement (reliability) by using simply the entire total observations to calculate agreement.  Then calculate the separate percentages of agreement for scored and for unscored intervals.  Compare these ways of calculating reliability and comment upon the possible biases of each.

 

FSC estimated investment of practicum effort:  3 points

 

*Competency 4:  Identification and measurement of relevant setting events. 

 

Definition:   A setting event refers to the context or circumstance in which an environment-behavior relationship occurs. The event changes the strengths of stimuli and responses involved in an environment-behavior interaction.  Setting events (or contexts), include complex antecedent conditions, events and stimulus response interactions, that exert general control over other stimulus-response interactions. Setting events may precede and/or overlap with other discrete stimulus-response (SD - R) relationships (e.g., noisy surroundings could influence adversely the interaction between a work assignment and a student's performance). 

 

Directions:  The events you manipulate can be either antecedents or consequences.  The intimidation effect of a teacher walking into a noisy room is a setting event.  How much sleep a person had is a setting event.  Abnormal social behaviors of others are setting events.  While behavior analysis focuses upon consequence manipulation, many problems can be solved by manipulating antecedent events without consequence manipulation.  The key here is to show a functional relationship between the setting event and the behavior.   

 

FSC estimated investment of practicum effort:   ___2__ point(s)

 

Accuracy of measurement

  

 *Competency 5:  Construct behavioral definitions of behavior described in vernacular terms. 

 

Definition:  The verbal culture of applied situations if full of terminology heavily laden with references to internal causation.  We are said to be searching for the "purpose" of behavior.  Children have bad behavior because they are "emotionally disturbed."  Difficulties are said to be rooted in "cognitive processing deficits," and so on.  But when practical action is necessary, we must manipulate relevant controlling variables, which are OUTSIDE the individual.  Thus, the ability to convert a vernacular analysis to a behavioral analysis involves replacement of lay terms with scientific terminology that refers to variables available for manipulation and direct analysis (e.g., variable, repertoire, probability, operant, discriminative stimulus., etc.). 

 

Directions:  Find a recent newspaper article discussing the kind of applied situation for which you are preparing.  Make a copy of it and highlight the words referring to behavioral problems and possible solutions.  With numbers, key a second sheet to these references and convert the newspaper writer's analysis into a behavioral analysis.  Use the terminology carefully and suggest good solutions to the problems. 

 

FSC estimated investment of practicum effort:   ___2__ point(s)

 

*Competency 6:  Evaluate observer reactivity.

 

Definition:  Observers sometimes perform differently when they are themselves being evaluated or observed.  This is called observer reactivity.  They may be more or less accurate when they are aware of being observed. 

 

Directions:  Select a target behavior that is relatively difficult to measure.  Measure it yourself and check your reliability with someone.  Then pick a new observer for the target behavior.  Construct a situation where you will be able to observe the same behavior the new observer is watching without his or her knowing.  Schedule a couple of sessions when the observer thinks s/he is observing alone, however, you are secretly also observing.  Then schedule several sessions when your observer knows you are taking data also.  Compare the reliability agreements between your data with the new observer.  Comment upon your accuracy and the accuracy of your new observer.  If it changed, you have demonstrated observer reactivity.

 

FSC estimated investment of practicum effort:   __3___ point(s)

           

Competency 7:  Evaluate treatment drift. 

 

Definition:  Not to be confused with observer drift, treatment drift refers to what is often called "procedural integrity."  The independent variable procedures applied to bring about a change in behavior may not be delivered evenly or consistently over a period of time.  In a reversal design, for example, the second application of the treatment may in some way differ from the first application, possibly resulting in different effects.  In a multiple-baseline design, the treatment may not be precisely in the same way to the second "element."  The problem is of widespread concern in behavior analysis. 

 

Directions:  This sophisticated competency involves creating procedures for carefully documenting the consistency of delivery of the treatment.  It may involve an extra observer with checklist, timers, and counters that monitors treatment application from session to session.  Evidence of consistency is presented in graphs describing critical dimensions of treatment procedures.  Such monitoring, itself, must have reliability checks.  All of this suggesting why evaluation of treatment drift or integrity is seldom accomplished. 

 

FSC estimated investment of practicum effort:   __5___ point(s)

 

            Competency 8:  Identify sequence effects. 

 

Definition:  SEQUENCE EFFECTS in the behavior of a subject may result from contact with a prior condition.  A sequence effect is a situation in which one experimental treatment phase within the experiment influences subsequent performance during another treatment phase.   

 

Directions:  Evidence of a sequence effect is shown when by comparing performance during an ABAB with performances during simply going from condition A to B, or B to A.  It may also be shown using multiple baselines with alternation in one element that is contrasted with sequences or non-sequences in another element.  The satisfaction of this relatively sophisticated competency would likely come as part of a carefully controlled experiment (as for thesis research).  Graphs should present the contrasting data, together with an explanation. 

 

FSC estimated investment of practicum effort:   __4___ point(s)

 

Calibration of measurement procedures

 

Competency 9:  Calibrate a measurement procedure.

 

Definition:  CALIBRATION is a method of evaluating the accuracy and reliability of a measurement system and, if necessary, using the results to improve the system so that it provides more accurate or reliable data.   ACCURACY is the extent to which observed values approximate the "true" state of nature.  The "true" value is approximated through the use of a measurement system, which may involve coded observation sheets or electronic devices.  Calibration in behavior analysis frequently deals with getting observers to produce more accurate data and may involve observer training and retraining. 

 

Directions:  Train two observers to quantify a difficult to observe dimension of behavior---one on which very high interobserver agreement is difficult to achieve.  Document discussions you have with your observers when the records of all three are compared.  Determine where and why your total reliability figures differ and adjust your recording/observing techniques such that your data coincide.   Keep in mind that all observers may agree, yet the figures they agree on may not reflect the "true" value. 

 

FSC estimated investment of practicum effort:   __3___ point(s)

 

 *Competency 10:  Accuracy, agreement, calibration, and evaluation of observer drift. 

 

Definitions:  RELIABILITY (often referred to as interobserver agreement) is the consistency of measurement in applied behavior analysis, preferably, different observers estimate reliability by assessing the interobserver agreement, or coefficient of agreement between two or more independently scored records of data in the same episodes. The coefficient of agreement often is calculated as a percentage by dividing the number of agreements by the number of agreements plus disagreements, then multiplying the fraction by one hundred.  Agreement measures should be reported for each phase of a within subject design when feasible.  When estimating reliability of interval recording systems, if there are many unscored intervals, only scored intervals should be included in the calculations. Or two separate percentages of agreement can calculated-one for scored, one for unscored intervals.  OBSERVER DRIFT is the point at which indexes of agreement between observers begin to diverge.  CALIBRATION involves training observers to improve interobserver agreement scores, or to maintain their performance at acceptably high levels.  ACCURACY (validity) refers to the degree to which the measurements approximate truly happened. 

 

Directions:  This competency may be acquired in conjunction with others.  The emphasis of this competency, however, is to pick a relatively difficult behavior to measure and show how you calibrated observer behavior.  Simply obtaining high interobserver agreement does not ensure accuracy-which is the extent to which the behavior was truly described by the measurement.  You should observe long enough such that the disparity between observers begins to "drift" or diverge, showing how you then recalibrated the observers. 

 

FSC estimated investment of practicum effort:   __3___ point(s)

 

Data recording methods

 

*Competency 11:  Identify and measure permanent products.

 

Definitions:  PERMANENT PRODUCT RECORDING is a method in which durable products of a behavior--such as the number of windows broken, widgets produced, homework problems handed in, rejects, percentage of test questions correct, and so on-are assessed.  (Note:  this is a method not suited to measuring transitory behaviors). 

 

Directions:  Your materials should include a graph showing the data you obtained from at least three sessions/days of observation and you should have an accompanying reliability check showing the accuracy was at least 80% (showing the method of reliability calculation). 

 

FSC estimated investment of practicum effort:   __2___ points

 

*Competency 12:  Employ whole interval and partial interval recording techniques.   

 

Definition:   Interval measurement is a strategy used in applied behavior analysis to assess the rate of target behavior. A block of time is selected and divided into short-equal intervals, and if the target behavior occurs it is recorded once in an appropriate time bin. For example, a 30-minute segment of mathematics class may be divided into 10-second intervals. Regardless of the number of responses, if the behavior occurs in a given 10-second interval, then the observer records it as a single event.  Partial interval measurement is a procedure whereby a response is recorded if it occurs at any time(s)-even momentarily-during the interval, and not necessarily throughout the interval, as in whole interval recording. Whole interval recording requires the response to be emitted throughout the entire interval for its presence to be scored. (Note:  Interval measurement can be tricky.  Whether a behavior is recorded as being present at all, or for the full interval, may give different pictures as well as different interobserver agreements.) 

 

Directions:  Select a target behavior that occurs relatively often during the observation session.  Compose a data sheet with 10 or 20 second intervals.  Record behavior with a second observer.  Compare data taken over at least two or three days (or observation sessions), calculating interobserver agreement.  Then observe simultaneously with one observer recording by whole-interval scoring and the other by partial-interval scoring.  Briefly discuss how the data reveal bias in accuracy.   

 

FSC estimated investment of practicum effort:   __3___ points

 

*Competency 13:  Employ various time sampling techniques 

 

Definition:  A method of recording used mostly in applied behavior analysis. Behavior is sampled over a long time scale. The idea is to make observations at specified times throughout the day.  For example, a patient on a psychiatric ward may be observed every 30 minutes, as a nurse does the rounds, and instances of psychotic talk are recorded.  Time sampling is a direct observational procedure in which the presence or absence of specific behaviors is recorded within short uniform time intervals. (E.g., an observer observes for 10 seconds and records the occurrence or nonoccurrence of a behavior during the following 5 seconds.) This procedure may continue for a specific 30-minute period each day. Time-sampling variations include. (1) Whole-interval time-sampling, (2) partial-interval time-sampling, and (3) momentary time-sampling.  Momentary time sampling is a discontinuous observation procedure in which the observational period is divided into intervals but the observer only notes the status of the target behavior during a "moment" following the end of each interval. 

 

Directions: